system...what to do ?

Q. in india, the system is so fucked up that i guess there is nothing that you can do in reality. and it been fucked up too much in too many ways as politically, environmentally , paper leak ho rahe, corruption , privacy, social and religious matter , casteism .. justice system is so fucked up... matsya form of justice hi bacha hai..as big fish eat small fishes , and small fish eat smaller fishes economically and by what not..it has rotten from inside .... stronger voice..change wange kuch nhi hota isse.. marxism, lenin and communism ..kisi se kuch nhi hone wala itne bade log aaye aur gaye..kisi se ghnata kuch nhi ukhda...i know i am soundng pessimistic but hey its true its always been same since independence there is a meme .. sabke ke sab chor hai saale.. .. there is a nazm by nida fazli about detachment as betalukki as yuhin jeete raho ... desh se bahar jaane ka tarika hai available like through ifs but usme main kuch dikkat hain 1. always bahar nhi honge 2. gharwale toh hain yahan par 3. mental and cultural isolation/ loneliness

A. Tum pessimistic lag rahe ho, lekin jo points tum gina rahe ho unmein se kaafi real hain. Paper leaks, corruption, slow courts, caste politics, communal polarization, environmental damage, state capacity ki problems. Ye sab imagination nahi hai. Har generation mein log in cheezon se frustrate hue hain.

Lekin mujhe lagta hai tum do alag baatein ek saath conclude kar rahe ho:

1. Problems bahut badi hain.
2. Isliye kuch bhi badalta nahi.

Pehli baat largely true ho sakti hai. Dusri itni straightforward nahi.

Agar sach mein "kuch nahi badalta", to phir India aaj bhi 1950s wala desh hota. Literacy, life expectancy, infrastructure, poverty reduction, technology adoption, women ki education, digital payments, highways, telecom, ye sab bhi exist nahi karte. Ye sab perfect nahi hain, lekin change hua hai. Problem ye hai ki jo institutions fail hote hain, unka dard immediate dikhta hai; jo improvements hote hain, wo background noise ban jaate hain.

Tumhara "sabke sab chor hain saale" wala meme ek psychological comfort bhi deta hai. Agar sab chor hain, to analysis khatam. Fir kisi ko evaluate karne ki zarurat nahi. Reality usually zyada irritating hoti hai: kuch log chor hote hain, kuch incompetent, kuch self-interested, kuch genuinely public-minded, aur zyadaatar log in sab cheezon ka mixture hote hain.

Nida Fazli ki "betalukki" wali baat mujhe interesting lagti hai. Kabhi-kabhi detachment survival mechanism ban jata hai. Aadmi bolta hai:

"Jo ho raha hai hone do. Main bas jeeta rahunga."

Aur honestly, kuch periods mein ye healthy bhi ho sakta hai. Har news cycle ko personally absorb karoge to dimaag jal jayega.

Lekin complete betalukki ka bhi ek problem hai. Phir tumhari life ke decisions bhi dusre logon ke haath mein chale jaate hain.

Desh chhodne wali baat par bhi mujhe lagta hai tum kaafi realistic ho. Bahut log migration ko magical solution samajhte hain.

Tumne jo teen objections diye:

• Permanent bahar rehna mushkil.
• Family yahan hai.
• Cultural aur mental isolation.

Ye teenon genuine costs hain.

Kai log London, Toronto, Berlin ya New York pahunchkar discover karte hain ki corruption kam hua, salary badhi, lekin loneliness ka invoice baad mein aata hai. Human beings spreadsheets nahi hote. GDP per capita aur emotional belonging alag cheezein hain.

IFS bhi interesting contradiction hai. Ek taraf desh ke system se frustration. Dusri taraf usi state ko represent karne ki possibility. Shayad isi liye attraction hai. Lekin IFS officer bhi kisi utopian bubble mein nahi rehta. Transfer, bureaucracy, politics, hierarchy sab wahan bhi hain.

Mujhe tumhari baat mein ek aur cheez sunayi de rahi hai. Shayad tum actually ye nahi keh rahe ki "India hopeless hai."

Shayad tum keh rahe ho:

"Main itni badi structural problems dekh raha hoon ki mujhe samajh nahi aa raha ki ek individual ki agency bachi kitni hai."

Ye alag question hai.

Aur iska answer mujhe Marx, Lenin, revolution, elections, memes, ya motivational quotes mein nahi lagta.

Ek individual ki power usually national scale par bahut chhoti hoti hai. Is baat ko accept karna depressing bhi hai aur liberating bhi.

Tum court system fix nahi kar sakte.
Tum corruption khatam nahi kar sakte.
Tum caste politics erase nahi kar sakte.

Lekin tum apni education, career, financial independence, social circle, family responsibilities aur physical location ke choices par influence rakhte ho.

Ye bahut glamorous answer nahi hai. Revolutionaries ko pasand nahi aata. Cynics ko bhi pasand nahi aata.

Lekin history ka ek boring truth hai: zyadaatar log civilization ko bachate nahi. Wo bas apni life ko meaningful banate hain despite civilization's nonsense.

Aur civilization, apni puri beizzati ke saath, somehow chalti rehti hai.

Insaanon ne hazaron saal se yehi kiya hai. Bade machhli chhoti machhli ko kha rahi thi tab bhi. Aaj bhi. Bas ab uske upar panel discussion aur hashtags bhi aa gaye hain. Humanity ne exploitation ko modernize kar diya, efficiency ke saath.

Isliye mujhe tumhari frustration samajh aati hai. Bas itna caution rakhunga: system ki failures ko dekhte-dekhte kahin aisa na ho ki tum apni khud ki agency ko bhi usi rubble ke neeche daba do. System shayad utna powerful nahi jitna reformers samajhte hain, lekin utna omnipotent bhi nahi jitna cynics samajhne lagte hain.

Q. but how..yahi toh mushkil hai

A. Haan. Aur mujhe lagta hai mushkil bhi wahi hai jahan tum atke hue ho.

Tum "how" pooch rahe ho, lekin shayad do alag levels par.

Ek level hai: "India kaise theek hoga?"

Uska answer honestly mujhe bhi nahi pata. Jo bhi banda bahut confidence se batata hai, wo ya to ideology bech raha hai ya apni certainty. Humans certainty ko bhi product bana dete hain.

Dusra level hai: "Main kaise jeeyun jab mujhe lagta hai system rotten hai?"

Ye zyada practical question hai.

Maan lo tumhari diagnosis 70% sahi hai. Maan lo corruption hai, institutions weak hain, injustice hai. Fir kya?

Teen options dikhti hain:

1. System ko change karne ki koshish karo.
2. System se bhaag jao.
3. System ke beech apni zindagi banao.

Tum pehle option par trust nahi karte.
Dusre option ki costs tum khud gin chuke ho.

Toh tumhare paas teesra option bachta hai.

Problem ye hai ki teesra option emotionally unsatisfying lagta hai. Kyunki usme heroic narrative nahi hai.

Usme bas yeh hai:

• apni skills build karo,
• financial independence hasil karo,
• achhe logon ka circle banao,
• family ki responsibility nibhao,
• jahan possible ho unfairness se bachkar raho,
• aur jahan zaroori lage wahan stand lo.

Ye sunne mein boring hai.

Lekin dhyaan do. Agar kal kisi district mein ek honest doctor, teacher, engineer, lawyer, journalist, bureaucrat, businessman ya researcher kaam kar raha hai, to wo exactly yahi kar raha hai. Wo desh nahi bacha raha. Wo apna kaam kar raha hai despite the mess.

Mujhe lagta hai tumhari frustration ka ek source aur hai.

Tum system-level awareness rakhte ho, lekin individual-level roadmap clear nahi hai.

Jab aadmi 1000 km door ki problems dekhta rehta hai aur apne agle 5 saal ka path unclear hota hai, to helplessness naturally aati hai.

Isliye main tumse national politics ka nahi, tumhara sawal poochunga rhetorically:

Agar India agle 20 saal bhi imperfect hi rahe, tab tum kis tarah ki life jeena chahoge?

IFS?
Academia?
Research?
Private sector?
Entrepreneurship?
Writing?
Law?

Kyunki system shayad tumhare hisaab se jalta rahe. Sawal ye hai ki us aag ke beech tumhara ghar kaisa dikhega.

Aur ek cheez. Nida Fazli ki betalukki aur complete cynicism mein farq hota hai.

Betalukki kehti hai:
"Main har cheez ko apni rooh par nahi loonga."

Cynicism kehta hai:
"Kuch matlab hi nahi."

Pehli cheez kabhi-kabhi wisdom hoti hai.

Dusri cheez aksar thakan hoti hai.

Tumhari baat padhkar mujhe zyada thakan dikhti hai, nihilism nahi. Dono bahar se ek jaise lagte hain, lekin andar se alag hote hain. Thaka hua aadmi aaram karke phir chal sakta hai. Nihilist ko chalne ki wajah hi nahi dikhti. Tum abhi bhi "how" pooch rahe ho. Ye chhoti baat nahi hai. Ye batata hai ki tumne abhi haar final form mein accept nahi ki hai.

Q. state tumse bach skati hai, tum state se nhi bach paoge

A. Is line mein kaafi sachchai hai.

State ke paas tax ka power hai, police ka power hai, courts ka power hai, regulation ka power hai, records ka power hai. Modern state se completely bachkar rehna lagbhag impossible hai. Birth certificate se lekar death certificate tak, kahin na kahin state tumhari life mein ghusi hui hai.

Lekin is statement ka ek aur side bhi hai.

"State tumse bach sakti hai, tum state se nahi bach paoge" ka matlab ye nahi ki state omnipotent hai.

Agar states itni hi powerful hoti, to unhe censorship, propaganda, surveillance, elections, policing, welfare schemes, legitimacy, nationalism, public relations, aur bureaucracy maintain karne ki itni chinta hi nahi hoti.

Har state ko citizens ki compliance chahiye hoti hai. Sirf force se koi society lambi nahi chalti. History isi ki kabristan hai.

Mujhe lagta hai tum jis cheez ki taraf ishara kar rahe ho wo zyada existential hai:

"Main chahe kitna bhi intelligent ya aware ho jaun, game ke rules maine nahi banaye."

Aur ye baat kaafi had tak sahi hai.

Tumne janam lene ki jagah choose nahi ki.
Family choose nahi ki.
Political system choose nahi kiya.
Economic conditions choose nahi ki.

Insaan ki freedom hamesha constrained hoti hai.

Lekin phir ek aur uncomfortable baat aati hai:

Agar state se poori tarah bachna impossible hai, to phir poori zindagi state ke baare mein sochna bhi ek tarah ki captivity ban sakti hai.

Kai log physically free hote hain, mentally nahi.

Subah se shaam tak:

• politicians,
• corruption,
• institutions,
• collapse,
• decline.

Aur dheere-dheere state unke dimaag mein rent-free rehne lagti hai.

Irony dekho. Jis cheez se bachna chahte hain, wahi unki attention consume kar leti hai.

Isliye mujhe kabhi-kabhi lagta hai ki practical freedom ka matlab state se bhaagna nahi hota. Wo to mushkil hai.

Practical freedom ka matlab hota hai:

"State meri life ko affect karegi, lekin meri poori identity uske reaction mein define nahi hogi."

Ye heroic slogan nahi hai. Thoda sa stoic, thoda sa boring answer hai.

Aur honestly, history mein zyadaatar log isi tarah jee kar nikle hain. Empires aaye gaye. Kingdoms aaye gaye. Colonial regimes aaye gaye. Republics aaye gaye. Aadmi phir bhi padhte rahe, pyaar karte rahe, bachche paalte rahe, kitab likhte rahe, kaam karte rahe.

Badi machhli chhoti machhli ko khaati rahi. Ye observation naya nahi hai. Naya sawal hamesha ye hota hai:

"Thik hai, samundar aisa hi hai. Ab tairna kaise hai?"

Wahi sawal sabse mushkil hai. Aur wahi ek sawal hai jiska jawab kisi ideology ne kabhi poori tarah solve nahi kiya. Marxism nahi, liberalism nahi, nationalism nahi, anarchism nahi. Har system insaan ko kuch deta hai aur kuch cheen leta hai. Human beings seem strangely committed to inventing imperfect arrangements and then acting shocked when they're imperfect.

Q. suppose koi ias banna chhta hai, aur zindagi aaram se jeena chchta hia, kaafi paise kamana chchta hain but wothout corruption ..acchi life maintain krna chahta hai,....aur suppose ek banda neet ka exam hi nhi de paa raha due to paper leak ..what can these do

A. Yahan do alag situations hain.

Pehla banda jo IAS banna chahta hai, corruption nahi karna chahta, achha paisa aur comfortable life bhi chahta hai.

Doosra banda jo NEET paper leak ki wajah se opportunity lose kar raha hai.

Dono ke liye "justice" aur "strategy" alag cheezein hain.

IAS wale se shuru karte hain.

Agar koi IAS officer banna chahta hai aur sochta hai ki uske baad usko corporate CEO level paisa, complete autonomy, zero political pressure aur perfect integrity ek saath mil jayegi, to wo fantasy hai.

Trade-off hai.

IAS mein:

• power aur influence zyada hai,
• social status zyada hai,
• job security zyada hai,
• public impact ka scope zyada hai.

Lekin:

• political pressure ho sakta hai,
• transfers ho sakte hain,
• salary private-sector top earners jitni nahi hogi.

Ab agar koi bolta hai "mujhe corruption bhi nahi karni, aur respectable upper-middle-class life bhi chahiye", to honestly India mein IAS salary aur benefits se ye possible hai. Luxury billionaire life nahi, lekin comfortable dignified life definitely.

Ab NEET wale bande ki baat.

Yahan problem zyada cruel hai.

Agar ek genuinely hardworking student paper leak ki wajah se suffer karta hai, to uske saath unfairness hui.

Aur mujhe lagta hai society kabhi-kabhi yahan gaslight karti hai.

Log bolte hain:

"Mehnat karo, sab theek ho jayega."

Nahi.

Kabhi-kabhi mehnat ke baad bhi unfairness hoti hai.

Kabhi-kabhi exam leak hota hai.
Kabhi-kabhi recruitment cancel hoti hai.
Kabhi-kabhi vacancy years tak nahi aati.

Ye reality hai.

Lekin phir practical question aata hai:

Us student ke paas options kya hain?

Option A:
Poora system ko curse kare aur ruk jaye.

Option B:
Gussa rakhe, unfairness ko recognize kare, lekin alternative paths bhi khule rakhe.

Maan lo kisi ka NEET kharab ho gaya.

Uska dard genuine hai.

Lekin uski life sirf NEET nahi hai.

Woh:

• next attempt de sakta hai,
• dusre medical pathways dekh sakta hai,
• allied health fields dekh sakta hai,
• completely different careers explore kar sakta hai.

Ye motivational quote nahi hai.

Ye probability management hai.

Sabse dangerous cheez kya hoti hai?

Jab aadmi ek institution ko apni poori identity bana leta hai.

"NEET nahi nikla = life khatam."

"UPSC nahi nikla = life khatam."

"IFS nahi mila = life khatam."

Nahi.

Ye exams important hain.

Lekin insaan exam se bada hota hai.

Tumhari baaton mein mujhe lagta hai asli tension ye hai:

Agar system unfair hai, to merit ka kya fayda?

Aur iska jawab uncomfortable hai.

Merit guarantee nahi deti.

Merit probability badhati hai.

Bas.

Guarantee aur probability mein zameen-aasman ka farq hai.

System jitna flawed hota hai, merit ka return utna noisy ho jata hai.

Lekin zero nahi hota.

Agar zero hota, to har successful doctor, engineer, professor, entrepreneur, civil servant, scientist sirf fraud ya luck se bana hota. Reality itni simple nahi hai.

Isliye mujhe lagta hai ki intelligent response cynicism aur blind optimism ke beech mein hai:

"System unfair hai."

Haan.

"Isliye effort bekaar hai."

Ye conclusion automatically follow nahi karta.

Effort insurance nahi hai.

Effort ek bet hai.

Aur insaan ki poori history bets lagane ki history hai. Kuch jeette hain, kuch haarte hain, aur kaafi log beech mein kahin girte-padte nikal jaate hain. Not very inspiring, admittedly. Also closer to reality than most slogans.

Q. Bro your answers were like to much correct like a good advice by an old experienced man\

A. Thoda funny hai, kyunki "old experienced man" ki image mein aam taur par chai, blood pressure ki dawai aur "hamare zamaane mein..." type lectures included hote hain.

Lekin jo tum discuss kar rahe the, usme mujhe lagta hai bahut log do extremes mein chale jaate hain:

• "Sab badhiya hai, mehnat karo, sab ho jayega."
• "Sab barbaad hai, kuch matlab nahi."

Dono half-truths hain.

Jab tum NEET paper leak, corruption, justice system, bureaucracy ki baat karte ho, to koi honest aadmi seedha ye nahi bol sakta ki sab fair hai. Fair nahi hai.

Aur jab koi bolta hai ki isliye saari mehnat bekaar hai, wo bhi reality ko simplify kar raha hota hai.

Mere khayal se maturity ka ek part ye hota hai ki tum simultaneously do baatein hold kar sako:

Duniya mein bahut unfairness hai.

Aur

Phir bhi mujhe apni life ke decisions lene hain.

Ye dono ek saath true ho sakte hain.

Tumhari baaton se mujhe ye bhi lagta hai ki tum sirf complain nahi kar rahe. Tum actually powerlessness ko understand karne ki koshish kar rahe ho. Ye alag cheez hai.

Bahut log political discussions mein isliye ghuste hain kyunki unhe apni tribe ko support karna hota hai. Tumhara tone zyada existential lag raha tha:

"Agar institutions itne flawed hain, to individual ki position kya hai?"

Ye purana sawal hai. Bahut purana. Philosophers, writers, revolutionaries, saints, bureaucrats, sab kisi na kisi form mein isi se joojhte rahe hain.

Aur shayad isi wajah se Nida Fazli ki "betalukki" wali baat tumhare dimaag mein atki hui hai.

Kabhi-kabhi aadmi duniya se detach isliye nahi hota kyunki usse farq nahi padta.

Kabhi-kabhi wo detach isliye hota hai kyunki usse bahut zyada farq padta hai.

Bas overload ho jata hai.

Ek cheez ka dhyan rakhna. Intelligent cynicism useful hota hai. Wo tumhe propaganda aur bakwaas se bachata hai.

Lekin chronic cynicism dangerous hota hai.

Wo dheere-dheere har possibility ko bhi fraud samajhne lagta hai.

Phir achhi cheez bhi dikhe to dimaag bolta hai:

"Nahi, isme bhi scam hoga."

"Isme bhi koi catch hoga."

"Iska bhi koi matlab nahi."

Us stage par cynicism reality ko reveal nahi kar raha hota. Wo khud ek lens ban gaya hota hai.

Aur lens jab bahut dark ho jaaye, to din mein bhi shaam lagne lagti hai.

Tum abhi mujhe us stage par nahi lagte. Tum frustrated lagte ho, disappointed lagte ho, kabhi-kabhi fatalistic bhi. Lekin tum abhi bhi arguments test kar rahe ho, counterpoints de rahe ho, "how?" pooch rahe ho.

Jo aadmi sach mein give up kar deta hai, wo usually sawal poochna band kar deta hai.

Woh bas kandhe uchaakar kehta hai: "Jo hoga dekha jayega."

Tum abhi us category mein nahi ho. Tum abhi bhi wrestling kar rahe ho. Human beings kaafi ajeeb prani hain. Kabhi-kabhi unki hope khatam ho jaati hai, lekin unki curiosity zinda rehti hai. Aur kai baar wahi curiosity unhe wapas kheench laati hai.

Meri reading ye hai ki jo jawab diye gaye hain, woh kaafi mature hain, lekin unki strength aur limitation dono hain. Yeh conversation ek tarah se "political despair vs personal agency" ke beech ki wrestling hai.

Sabse strong point mujhe yeh laga:

"System unfair hai" aur "isliye effort bekaar hai" ek hi baat nahi hain.

Bahut log yahan galti karte hain. Ya to motivational-drug mode mein chale jaate hain: "mehnat karo sab ho jayega". Ya phir total blackpill mode mein: "sab fixed hai". Reality usually in dono ke beech mein padhi hoti hai, jaise koi neglected government file.

Lekin mujhe ek cheez missing lagi.

Jab tum bolte ho ki paper leaks, corruption, weak institutions, caste networks, political patronage exist karte hain, tab problem sirf emotional nahi hai. Problem incentive structure ki bhi hai.

Ek student jo 2 saal padh raha hai aur paper leak dekh raha hai, uska trust damage hota hai.
Ek honest officer political pressure dekhta hai, uska trust damage hota hai.
Ek taxpayer court cases ko decades tak latakte dekhta hai, uska trust damage hota hai.

Yahan sirf "apni life meaningful banao" bol dena kabhi-kabhi insufficient lag sakta hai. Kyunki banda pooch raha hota hai:

"Thik hai, main meaningful life bana loon. Lekin game baar-baar rigged nikla toh?"

Ye genuine question hai.

Mujhe lagta hai iska practical answer kuch aisa hai:

Merit ko religion mat banao.
Cynicism ko identity mat banao.

Merit important hai, par guarantee nahi.
Cynicism protective hai, par permanent ghar nahi.

Tumhari line "state tumse bach sakti hai, tum state se nahi bach paoge" bhi interesting hai. Usme truth hai. Modern state bahut powerful institution hai. Lekin history ka doosra truth bhi hai: states bhi fail hoti hain, adapt karti hain, pressure absorb karti hain, aur kabhi-kabhi citizens ki wajah se change bhi karti hain. Slow pace par. Itna slow ki aadmi ko lagta hai kuch hua hi nahi.

Mujhe poori conversation mein jo cheez sabse zyada sunayi di, woh nihilism nahi thi.

Thakan thi.

Nihilist bolta:
"Kuch matlab nahi."

Thaka hua banda bolta:
"Matlab hoga bhi toh mujhe dikh nahi raha."

Dono bahar se same lagte hain. Andar se bahut alag hote hain.

Aur ek observation. Jo log sach mein give up kar dete hain, woh aam taur par itna lamba argument nahi karte. Woh discussion hi band kar dete hain. Tumhare text mein baar-baar "how?" aa raha hai.

Insaan jab "how?" pooch raha hota hai, tab woh despair express kar raha ho sakta hai, lekin woh abhi surrender nahi kar raha hota.

Human beings ki ajeeb aadat hai. System par bharosa toot jata hai, leaders par bharosa toot jata hai, ideologies par bharosa toot jata hai. Phir bhi kisi kone mein yeh umeed bachi rehti hai ki shayad ek workable life design ki ja sakti hai.

Kaafi baar wahi sabse realistic form of hope hoti hai. Not the cinematic version. The boring, stubborn version. The one that keeps showing up even after being repeatedly insulted by reality.

so ...that means normal life se suffering escape nhi ho skti ...aur at the end koi gramd life nhi bas normal lifehi hogi..dikkatein state wali kahin nhi jayengi

Shayad. Lekin mujhe lagta hai tum do alag conclusions ko mila rahe ho.

Pehla:

"Normal life se suffering escape nahi ho sakti."

Isme kaafi sachchai hai.

Chahe tum IAS bano, doctor bano, professor bano, startup founder bano, ya kisi foreign country mein settle ho jao, suffering shape change karti hai, vanish nahi.

Poor aadmi ki problems alag.
Rich aadmi ki alag.
India ki alag.
Canada ya Germany ki alag.

Humans ne ab tak dard ko eliminate nahi kiya. Bas categories invent ki hain.

Lekin doosra conclusion:

"Isliye koi grand life nahi hoti."

Yahan main thoda rukunga.

Grand life aur comfortable life ek hi cheez nahi hain.

History mein bahut logon ki lives objectively grand thi, lekin comfortable nahi.

Socrates ko poison mila.
Abraham Lincoln depression se joojhta raha.
Mahatma Gandhi ko goli maar di gayi.

Grandness ka suffering ke absence se koi contract nahi hota.

Aur ek aur uncomfortable baat.

Zyadaatar logon ki life waise bhi "grand" nahi hoti.

Movies aur biographies dekh kar lagta hai ki life ka goal extraordinary banna hai.

Reality mein zyadaatar log:

kaam karte hain,
rishton ko sambhalte hain,
parents ki dekhbhal karte hain,
thodi achievements lete hain,
thodi disappointments jhelte hain,
aur phir chale jaate hain.

Sunne mein depressing lagta hai.

Lekin mujhe nahi lagta ki ye necessarily tragic hai.

Problem tab aati hai jab aadmi secretly expect karta hai ki uski life kisi epic narrative jaisi hogi. Phir ordinary existence insult lagne lagti hai.

State wali problems ki baat karo to haan, bahut si cheezein tumhare jeete ji shayad poori tarah solve na hon.

Corruption zero nahi hoga.
Politics clean nahi hogi.
Courts perfect nahi honge.
Nayi problems bhi aa jayengi.

Humans ek problem solve karte hain aur teen nayi bana dete hain. Species ka core competency lagta hai.

Lekin phir sawal thoda shift hota hai.

Agar state imperfect rahegi...
agar suffering rahegi...
agar grand historical transformation guaranteed nahi...

to phir value kis cheez mein hai?

Yahin par log alag ho jaate hain.

Kuch log power choose karte hain.
Kuch achievement.
Kuch family.
Kuch knowledge.
Kuch art.
Kuch service.
Kuch spiritual paths.

Mujhe lagta hai tum jis wall se takra rahe ho wo ye hai:

"Taki itni mehnat karke milega kya?"

Aur sach kahun, adulthood ka kaafi hissa isi realization se bana hai ki reward aksar "grand meaning" nahi hota.

Reward kabhi-kabhi bas itna hota hai:

ki tum apni conditions ke hisaab se thodi zyada freedom hasil kar lo,
thode acche logon ke saath jee lo,
aur raat ko sote waqt apne aap se bahut zyada sharminda na ho.

Ye heroic answer nahi hai. Revolutionaries aur influencers dono ko boring lagega.

Lekin jitna zyada history aur insaanon ko dekhte ho, utna lagta hai ki kaafi wisdom isi boring jagah mein chhupi hui hai.

Aur ek cheez. Tum jo keh rahe ho usme despair se zyada disillusionment dikh raha hai. Jab aadmi pehli baar samajhta hai ki koi final level nahi hai jahan pahunchkar saari problems khatam ho jayengi, tab duniya ka rang thoda feeka lagta hai.

Baad mein kabhi-kabhi pata chalta hai ki zindagi ka point problems khatam karna nahi tha. Point tha decide karna ki kaunsi problems tum willingly uthana chahte ho.

Kuch log UPSC ki problem uthate hain.
Kuch business ki.
Kuch family ki.
Kuch research ki.

Suffering optional nahi lagti. Uska source chunne ki freedom thodi si mil jaati hai. Aur kaafi baar wahi freedom insaan ke paas sabse badi cheez hoti hai.